Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Media Turing Test

//Comments

The Media Equation by Byron Reeves and Clifford Nass was an interesting read about people's perception of media as real people and places. Essentially the authors describe different social rules and norms, replace people with the word computer, do some experiments to prove their predictions and report their findings. To sum things up completely, the authors essentially state that, in any given situation between two people or a person and a place, when the other person or place is replaced with some form of media (TV, computer, picture) the person will have the same reaction regardless. 

Though I agree with many of their findings, I felt that their approach to explaining how they went about their experiments was a bit dry and repetative. There were a few experiments that I was amazed at the results by. The one in particular about specialization is the one that I thought was most interesting. The rule is that people will accept certain infomation from a specialist person more readily than the same information from a generalized person. The hypothesis is that information presented by a specialist TV will be accepted and remembered more than the same information from a generalized TV. What they did to prove this was choose a clip of a news program and a clip from a movie to use as the control. For half the participants, both clips were shown on a single TV labled general, and the other half watched the news program on a news TV and the movie clip on the entertainment TV. Shocking enough, the people watching the programs on the specialized TVs though that they were more informative and entertaining.

Overall, though, the book was a different view on how emerging trends in media were starting to embed themselves into the cultural and societal rules.

4 comments:

  1. Heh, I know what you mean by the way they presented the material. I got a little tired of the show-statement-then-proof structure. It became all too predictable and maybe things would've been more interesting had they provided some proposals that seemed obvious but were actually proven false.

    ReplyDelete
  2. While I was surprised at the results of their specialist TV experiment, I am also very skeptical. I cannot believe that there really was any difference in the perceptions. I would like to see them try it again with a much larger sample size.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I was also surprised at the TV experiment but I do believe that it is possible that the advertising of a specialized TV can fool someone's perception of the image quality.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with you in that the book is "different." Like...different from books I enjoy reading. I hope she doesn't count of points for honesty.

    ReplyDelete